PREAXIA HEALTH CARE PAYMENT SYSTEMS INC. Material Event - Verified Summary

---

1. Event Description (What Happened)

PREAXIA has announced a critical and concerning development: the company fired its independent auditor, Saddler Gibb & Associates, and immediately hired a new one, M&K CPAs. This is no routine change; it stems from serious disagreements over PREAXIA's financial reporting and has escalated to direct involvement from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This auditor change is complex and signals deeper issues. Here's the critical backstory:

• Fundamental Accounting Disagreements: PREAXIA and its former auditor, Saddler Gibb, could not agree on how to value certain financial items (such as assets or investments) and what financial information was material (important enough to disclose) in past reporting periods. This represents a fundamental breakdown in how the company's financial health should be presented. PREAXIA has not detailed the specific items or periods of disagreement, which is a significant concern.
• Missed a Critical SEC Filing: Compounding these disagreements, PREAXIA missed a major SEC filing deadline – likely for its annual report. This indicates a serious compliance failure and potential issues with its internal financial controls.
• Direct SEC Involvement: Because of these unresolved issues, PREAXIA is now actively engaged in discussions with the SEC's Office of Chief Accountant. This is not a minor inquiry; the primary financial watchdog is directly scrutinizing PREAXIA's accounting practices and reporting.
• A Pattern of Auditor Instability: This is not an isolated incident. Saddler Gibb served as PREAXIA's auditor for a very short period (December 2025 to February 2026) and never issued any reports. Before them, PREAXIA terminated Fruci & Associates II, PLLC in December 2025, and GreenGrowth CPA’s resigned in October 2024. While the company has not fully disclosed the specific reasons for these previous changes, this rapid succession of auditors, especially when coupled with fundamental disagreements, is a major red flag for investors.

2. Event Date/Timeline

PREAXIA dismissed Saddler Gibb & Associates on February 19, 2026. The company appointed M&K CPAs the very next day, February 20, 2026. PREAXIA officially reported this significant event to the SEC on February 25, 2026.

3. Impact Assessment (Who/What is Affected)

This situation carries substantial weight for PREAXIA and its stakeholders:

• Erosion of Financial Trust: When a company and its auditor cannot agree on basic accounting principles like "valuation" (determining an asset's worth) and "materiality" (what information is important enough to disclose), it severely undermines the reliability and accuracy of PREAXIA's financial statements. Investors rely on these statements for informed decisions, so this uncertainty creates a crisis of confidence.
• Intense Regulatory Scrutiny & Potential Penalties: The SEC's direct involvement signals that these are not minor issues. This could lead to formal investigations, forced restatements of past financial reports, significant fines, or even the potential delisting of PREAXIA's stock from exchanges if the company does not adequately resolve the problems.
• Operational & Governance Weaknesses: Missing a critical filing deadline points to deeper issues within the company's operational efficiency, internal controls, or corporate governance.
• Severe Investor Confidence Hit: Frequent auditor changes, fundamental accounting disagreements, and direct SEC intervention will significantly damage investor confidence. This typically leads to increased stock price volatility and downward pressure, making it harder for the company to raise capital in the future.

This event sends ripples through several key groups:

• Investors: Your investment in PREAXIA now faces extreme uncertainty and likely significant downward pressure. The reliability of the company's reported financials is in question.
• PREAXIA Management & Board: They face immense pressure to resolve these accounting issues, satisfy the SEC, and ensure the new auditor signs off on accurate financial reports. Their credibility and leadership are directly on the line.
• Saddler Gibb & Associates: PREAXIA dismissed them, likely because they maintained their professional stance on accounting principles that differed from the company's.
• M&K CPAs: The new auditor steps into an exceptionally challenging, high-scrutiny situation, tasked with untangling past accounting disagreements under the SEC's watchful eye.
• Customers & Employees: While not immediately, prolonged financial instability, regulatory penalties, or a damaged reputation could eventually impact PREAXIA's ability to operate effectively, secure growth financing, or retain talent, potentially affecting service quality or job security.

What Happens Next? (The Road Ahead)

• Immediate Focus: PREAXIA must urgently work with M&K CPAs and the SEC to resolve the specific accounting disagreements and file its overdue periodic report. The company states it is actively engaged in these discussions, but it has not provided a clear timeline for resolution.
• Potential for Restatements: It is highly probable that PREAXIA will need to restate previous financial reports once it resolves these accounting issues. This could further complicate the financial picture and potentially reveal a different historical performance.
• Long-term Challenge: Rebuilding investor trust and demonstrating robust financial controls will be a long and arduous process. The company's ability to secure future financing, attract new investors, and maintain its market position will depend entirely on a swift, transparent, and satisfactory resolution of these issues with the SEC and its new auditor.

4. Financial Impact (if applicable)

The filing has not disclosed the direct, quantifiable financial impact specifically related to the change in auditors (e.g., termination fees for the former auditor or specific engagement fees for the new auditor). However, the underlying issues and their consequences will likely have significant indirect financial implications, including:

• Potential Regulatory Fines and Penalties: As noted, direct SEC involvement could result in significant fines.
• Increased Costs: Resolving accounting disagreements, engaging with the SEC, and potentially restating financial reports will likely incur substantial legal and accounting fees.
• Stock Price Volatility and Downward Pressure: Eroding investor confidence and market uncertainty are expected to negatively impact the company's stock valuation.
• Difficulty in Raising Capital: A damaged reputation and unreliable financials can make it harder and more expensive for PREAXIA to secure future financing.
• Potential for Restatements: Any required restatements could alter the company's historical financial performance, potentially revealing a less favorable financial picture.

5. Key Takeaways for Investors

For investors and traders, here's what you need to understand and do:

• Extreme Caution is Paramount: This situation represents a significant red flag. Disagreements with auditors over fundamental accounting, a missed filing deadline, and direct SEC involvement are among the most serious issues a public company can face.
• Expect Significant Volatility & Potential Downside: The market dislikes uncertainty, especially regarding financial integrity. PREAXIA's stock price will likely remain highly volatile and could experience substantial declines.
• Demand Transparency and Specifics: Do not settle for vague explanations. Look for specific details from PREAXIA regarding the exact nature of the accounting disagreements, the financial periods affected, and a clear, actionable plan and timeline for resolving issues and filing all overdue reports.
• Monitor SEC Filings Closely: Pay immediate attention to any further 8-K filings (reports of significant events), the eventual submission of the overdue annual report (and any subsequent restatements), and any public statements from the SEC. These will be critical indicators of progress or further deterioration.
• Understand the Gravity: Disagreements over "valuation" (how assets are priced) and "materiality" (what information is crucial for investors) are not minor technicalities. They go to the heart of a company's financial health, reporting integrity, and ultimately, its long-term viability. This situation suggests a significantly higher level of investment risk than usual.