View Full Company Profile

DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust

CIK: 1668738 Filed: March 23, 2026 10-K

Key Highlights

  • Successful dismissal of two major lawsuits against key troubled loan manager, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, reducing operational distractions.
  • Diversified loan portfolio with no single borrower exceeding 10% of the initial $1.04 billion loan value, spreading risk.
  • Robust operational oversight with compliance reports and statements available for all key servicers, ensuring accountability.
  • Smooth transition of main loan management responsibilities to Trimont LLC for many key properties, replacing Wells Fargo Bank.

Financial Analysis

DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust Annual Report - How They Did This Year

Hey there!

Let's chat about DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust's performance this past year. No fancy finance talk, just what you need to know.

This report covers their performance for the year ending on December 31, 2025.

1. What does this Trust do and how did it perform this year?

First, understand that DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust isn't a regular company. It doesn't sell products or services. Instead, it's an "investment Trust" or "securitization vehicle." Think of it like a special bank account. This account holds many commercial mortgage loans. These aren't home loans. They are for big properties like shopping centers, office buildings, and hotels. The Trust formed in 2016. It started with about $1.04 billion in commercial mortgage loans.

So, this Trust owns parts of these large commercial mortgage loans. Its main job is to collect payments from these loans. Then, it passes those payments to investors. These investors bought investments tied to these loans. You don't buy traditional "stock" in this Trust. It has no stock symbol or shares like Apple or Amazon.

For the year ending December 31, 2025, the Trust kept managing its commercial mortgage loans. Its key assets include parts of loans on properties like:

  • Williamsburg Premium Outlets (about 8.6% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $89.4 million)
  • 787 Seventh Avenue (about 9.8% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $101.9 million)
  • Naples Grande Beach Resort (about 7.3% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $75.9 million)
  • 225 Liberty Street (about 5.0% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $52.0 million)
  • 600 Broadway (about 4.9% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $50.9 million)
  • 7700 Parmer (about 3.9% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $40.6 million)
  • Columbus Park Crossing (about 3.7% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $38.5 million)
  • Hagerstown Premium Outlets (about 3.7% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $38.5 million)
  • Hall Office Park A1/G1/G3 (about 3.4% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $35.4 million)
  • Renaissance Providence Downtown Hotel (about 3.1% of the Trust's initial loan value, or $32.2 million)

Many of these loans are part of bigger "loan combinations." The Trust might own one piece of a loan. Other investors or trusts own other parts of that same loan. Often, these parts are on "equal footing." "Co-Lender Agreements" explain how these shared loans work. Examples include 225 Liberty Street and 787 Seventh Avenue. Sometimes, the Trust's portion has a "lower priority." This means it gets paid back after other parts if things go wrong. This increases the risk to the Trust's investment.

A good sign for spreading risk is that no single borrower's loan makes up 10% or more of the Trust's total assets. This is based on its initial loan value of $1.04 billion. This spreads out risk. No single loan is worth more than about $104 million of the initial portfolio.

Investors measure performance by how well the Trust receives interest and principal payments. These payments come from the commercial mortgage loans. This depends on the properties' health and operations. Things like occupancy rates, rental income, and property values matter. Borrowers must also make their loan payments. The Trust kept its role of holding and managing these loans.

2. Major wins and challenges this year

This year, who manages some of the Trust's key loans changed.

Major Operational Change: On March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC became the main loan manager for many Trust loans. They manage loans for properties such as Naples Grande Beach Resort, 225 Liberty Street, and Williamsburg Premium Outlets. Trimont LLC also became the main and troubled loan manager for 787 Seventh Avenue. Before this date, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association handled many of these roles. A new team now oversees payment collection and handles loan issues.

Also, the Managers for Troubled Loans (Special Servicers) changed for some key loans:

  • Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC became the troubled loan manager for 7700 Parmer on January 29, 2025. They took over from Midland Loan Services.
  • CWCapital Asset Management LLC remains the troubled loan manager for Columbus Park Crossing.
  • LNR Partners, LLC is the troubled loan manager for Hagerstown Premium Outlets.
  • Midland Loan Services remains the troubled loan manager for loans like 600 Broadway and Naples Grande Beach Resort.
  • Trimont LLC also became the troubled loan manager for 225 Liberty Street and 787 Seventh Avenue.

Operational Oversight & Accountability: A system checks if these companies (servicers) do their job right. This year, the Trust confirmed that reports checking compliance with servicing rules are available. These reports cover all key servicers. This includes the main loan manager, troubled loan managers, investment administrator, asset keeper, and oversight advisors. These reports and statements confirming servicers follow rules show that companies managing loans meet their duties. For example, separate reports exist for Wells Fargo (before March 1, 2025) and Trimont LLC (on and after March 1, 2025). Others include Midland Loan Services, Rialto Capital Advisors, CWCapital Asset Management, LNR Partners, Park Bridge Lender Services, CoreLogic Solutions, and Computershare Trust Company. This adds transparency and accountability to the complex setup.

Potential Challenges & Resolutions: The Trust relies on several key companies. This year brought updates on legal cases involving two of them:

  • CWCapital Asset Management LLC (CWCAM): This company manages troubled loans for some Trust loans, like Columbus Park Crossing. CWCAM faced two notable legal cases:

    • One long-running lawsuit, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., claimed CWCAM broke agreements and trust. After years of legal battles, the court dismissed the last two claims against CWCAM on January 13, 2026. This removed CWCAM as a defendant.
    • Another lawsuit, ROC Debt Strategies II Bond Investments LLC v. CWCapital Asset Management LLC, started on January 13, 2025. It claimed CWCAM was negligent in managing loans for a different trust. This case was permanently dismissed on January 22, 2026, after an agreement between the parties. CWCAM successfully handled these legal challenges. This helps its operations and ability to serve the Trust without distractions.
  • Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA): This company acts as an asset keeper and investment administrator for some Trust loans. DBTCA is still involved in several lawsuits. These relate to its role as trustee for other trusts holding home loan investments. These cases, some from 2014-2015, claim DBTCA failed to properly manage those trusts and collect loan payments.

    • In one case, Commerzbank AG, DBTCA is a defendant for one of 50 trusts. It faces claims like breaking agreements and trust. Many claims were dismissed. All arguments for a quick decision were submitted on September 26, 2024.
    • In another big case, IKB International, S.A., investors sued DBTCA (and an affiliate) as trustees for 37 trusts. They claim over $268 million in damages. Some claims were dismissed. Others for breaking agreements, trust, and conflicts of interest are still ongoing. Appeals continue. A partial reversal happened on June 15, 2023. These don't directly involve this Trust. But current lawsuits for a key service provider still create risks. They could take away resources, hurt reputation, or affect their job for this Trust. However, DBTCA believes these ongoing legal cases will not significantly impact its ability to perform its duties for this Trust.

3. Key risks that could hurt your investment value

Remember, this isn't a traditional stock. Your investment's value ties to how well the commercial mortgage loans perform.

Main risks for investors in DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust come from:

  • Commercial Property Performance: If properties like shopping centers struggle, borrowers might struggle to pay their loans. This happens with empty spaces, lower rental income, or a bad economy. This directly affects money coming into the Trust.

  • Loan Failures: If a borrower fails to pay a loan, the Trust might not get its expected payments. This could affect payments to investors. Taking over a property and getting money back can be long and costly. This could lead to big losses.

  • Loan Structure: The Trust often holds only parts of larger loans. Sometimes, these parts have a "lower priority" than others. They have a lower payment priority if a loan fails or assets are sold. "Co-Lender Agreements" formally lay out these priorities. For example, if a property faces financial trouble, the Trust's lower-priority portion might be paid last. This could mean greater losses compared to investors with higher priority. This significantly raises its risk level.

  • No Outside Safety Net: The Trust has no outside financial protection. No insurance or guarantees from another company protect it if loans underperform. Investors directly face the risk of these mortgages. There's no outside safety net.

  • Manager Performance & Stability: The Trust relies heavily on various companies to manage and collect payments. Issues with their performance, or their own challenges, could affect the Trust. Many different companies manage these loans. Their specific roles (main, primary, troubled loan manager, asset keeper, oversight advisor, or other service provider) add a lot of complexity. For instance, you have:

    • Trimont LLC as main and primary loan manager for many loans. They also manage troubled loans for 787 Seventh Avenue.
    • Midland Loan Services as troubled loan manager for loans like 600 Broadway.
    • Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as troubled loan manager for 7700 Parmer (after January 29, 2025).
    • CWCapital Asset Management LLC as troubled loan manager for Columbus Park Crossing.
    • LNR Partners, LLC as troubled loan manager for Hagerstown Premium Outlets.
    • Wells Fargo Bank, National Association still keeps assets for some loans. They were primary manager for many loans before March 1, 2025.
    • Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas keeps assets for 787 Seventh Avenue and Columbus Park Crossing.
    • Citibank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association keep assets for 225 Liberty Street.
    • Park Bridge Lender Services LLC and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC act as oversight advisors.
    • CoreLogic Solutions, LLC handles tax payments.
    • Computershare Trust Company, National Association (CTCNA) performs certain loan management tasks.

    This year saw developments in lawsuits involving key service providers:

    • CWCapital Asset Management LLC (CWCAM): This troubled loan manager was in two big lawsuits. Good news: claims against CWCAM in CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. were dismissed on January 13, 2026. Another case, ROC Debt Strategies II Bond Investments LLC, was dismissed on January 22, 2026, after an agreement. These dismissals happened after the year ended but before this report. They reduce potential distractions or costs for CWCAM. This helps the Trust it serves.
    • Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA): As an asset keeper and investment administrator, DBTCA is still in several long-running lawsuits. These relate to its role as trustee for other trusts holding home loan investments. These cases claim they failed to properly manage those trusts and collect loan payments. One case (IKB International, S.A.) claims over $268 million in damages. These don't directly involve this Trust. But current lawsuits for a key service provider still create risks. They could take away resources, hurt reputation, or affect their job for this Trust. However, DBTCA believes these ongoing legal cases will not significantly impact its ability to perform its duties for this Trust.
    • Positive Point: The Trust has reports checking compliance with servicing rules. It also has statements confirming servicers follow rules. These are available for all key service providers. These reports break down roles and loans. This helps ensure all companies meet their duties. It adds oversight to this complex structure.
  • Interest Rate Changes: The Trust's commercial mortgage loans are usually fixed-rate. But broader market interest rate changes still pose risks. Rising interest rates could make refinancing harder or more costly for borrowers. This might increase loan failures. Falling interest rates could encourage borrowers to pay early. This creates a risk of earning less on new investments. Also, interest rate changes directly impact the market value of the Trust's investments. Investors adjust their expected returns.

A positive point: no single borrower holds 10% or more of the Trust's initial $1.04 billion loan pool. This spreads out risk. A problem with one large loan won't affect the whole portfolio too much.

4. Competitive position

This section doesn't apply to DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust. As an investment Trust, it doesn't "compete" with other companies. It holds and manages specific assets for investors. It doesn't aim to grow bigger or beat competitors.

5. Leadership or strategy changes

This year saw changes in how the Trust manages its assets. The Trust has no traditional "leadership." It's a hands-off investment. Its investment strategy focuses on managing its current commercial mortgage loans.

But companies managing the loans day-to-day changed significantly. Annual reports confirm these roles:

  • Trimont LLC became the main loan manager for many loans on March 1, 2025. This includes Naples Grande and Williamsburg Premium Outlets. They replaced Wells Fargo Bank in many roles. Trimont LLC also became the troubled loan manager for 225 Liberty Street and 787 Seventh Avenue on or after March 1, 2025.
  • Midland Loan Services remains a troubled loan manager for many loans. This includes 600 Broadway and Naples Grande. They were also the troubled loan manager for 7700 Parmer before January 29, 2025.
  • Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC became the troubled loan manager for 7700 Parmer on or after January 29, 2025.
  • CWCapital Asset Management LLC serves as the troubled loan manager for Columbus Park Crossing.
  • LNR Partners, LLC serves as the troubled loan manager for Hagerstown Premium Outlets.
  • Wells Fargo Bank, National Association still keeps assets for some loans. They served as primary manager for many loans before March 1, 2025. Their compliance as main and primary loan manager before March 1, 2025, is reported separately.
  • Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas keeps assets for the 787 Seventh Avenue and Columbus Park Crossing loans.
  • U.S. Bank National Association keeps assets for the 225 Liberty Street loan. Citibank, N.A. hired them.
  • Citibank, N.A. keeps assets for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan.
  • Park Bridge Lender Services LLC and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC serve as "oversight advisors." They provide oversight for different loans.
  • CoreLogic Solutions, LLC manages tax payments for many loans.
  • Computershare Trust Company, National Association (CTCNA) handles certain loan management tasks. Citibank and Wells Fargo hired them. Their compliance as a "company helping with loan management" is also reported.

These changes mean many companies now manage different parts of the Trust's loans. Annual reports confirm their compliance.

Risk Factors

  • Significant exposure to commercial property performance, with potential for loan failures if properties struggle with occupancy or income.
  • Risk from complex loan structures, including lower-priority portions in co-lender agreements, increasing potential losses in default scenarios.
  • No outside financial protection or guarantees, meaning investors directly bear the risk of mortgage performance.
  • Ongoing legal challenges for Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA), a key service provider, which could impact resources or reputation, despite DBTCA's assurances.
  • Vulnerability to interest rate changes, potentially affecting borrower refinancing ability or the market value of Trust investments.

Why This Matters

This annual report for DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust is crucial for investors because it sheds light on the operational health and risk profile of their investment. Unlike traditional companies, this Trust's performance is directly tied to the stability of its underlying commercial mortgage loans and the efficiency of its various servicers. Understanding the recent servicer transitions, such as Trimont LLC taking over key management roles, provides insight into how the loan portfolio is being actively managed and whether these changes enhance or complicate oversight.

Furthermore, the resolution of significant legal challenges for CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a critical troubled loan manager, is a positive indicator. It suggests reduced operational distractions and potential liabilities for a key partner, which directly benefits the Trust's ability to manage distressed assets effectively. Conversely, the ongoing legal battles involving Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, even if related to other trusts, highlight a potential reputational or resource drain for another essential service provider, a risk investors must weigh. The report's emphasis on a diversified loan portfolio, with no single borrower exceeding 10% of the initial value, reassures investors about risk mitigation strategies, making this report a vital tool for assessing the investment's continued viability and potential for consistent returns.

Financial Metrics

Report End Date December 31, 2025
Trust Formation Year 2016
Initial Commercial Mortgage Loan Value $1.04 billion
Williamsburg Premium Outlets (initial loan value percentage) 8.6%
Williamsburg Premium Outlets (initial loan value amount) $89.4 million
787 Seventh Avenue (initial loan value percentage) 9.8%
787 Seventh Avenue (initial loan value amount) $101.9 million
Naples Grande Beach Resort (initial loan value percentage) 7.3%
Naples Grande Beach Resort (initial loan value amount) $75.9 million
225 Liberty Street (initial loan value percentage) 5.0%
225 Liberty Street (initial loan value amount) $52.0 million
600 Broadway (initial loan value percentage) 4.9%
600 Broadway (initial loan value amount) $50.9 million
7700 Parmer (initial loan value percentage) 3.9%
7700 Parmer (initial loan value amount) $40.6 million
Columbus Park Crossing (initial loan value percentage) 3.7%
Columbus Park Crossing (initial loan value amount) $38.5 million
Hagerstown Premium Outlets (initial loan value percentage) 3.7%
Hagerstown Premium Outlets (initial loan value amount) $38.5 million
Hall Office Park A1/ G1/ G3 (initial loan value percentage) 3.4%
Hall Office Park A1/ G1/ G3 (initial loan value amount) $35.4 million
Renaissance Providence Downtown Hotel (initial loan value percentage) 3.1%
Renaissance Providence Downtown Hotel (initial loan value amount) $32.2 million
Maximum Single Borrower Loan Percentage (initial value) 10%
Maximum Single Borrower Loan Amount (initial value) $104 million
Trimont L L C Main Loan Manager Start Date March 1, 2025
Rialto Capital Advisors, L L C 7700 Parmer Troubled Loan Manager Start Date January 29, 2025
C W Capital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. C W Capital Investments L L C Dismissal Date January 13, 2026
R O C Debt Strategies I I Bond Investments L L C v. C W Capital Asset Management L L C Start Date January 13, 2025
R O C Debt Strategies I I Bond Investments L L C v. C W Capital Asset Management L L C Dismissal Date January 22, 2026
Commerzbank A G Lawsuit Arguments Submitted Date September 26, 2024
I K B International, S. A. Lawsuit Claimed Damages over $268 million
I K B International, S. A. Lawsuit Partial Reversal Date June 15, 2023
D B T C A Commerzbank A G Lawsuit Trusts Involved one of 50 trusts
D B T C A I K B International, S. A. Lawsuit Trusts Involved 37 trusts
D B T C A Lawsuits Origin Years 2014-2015

About This Analysis

AI-powered summary derived from the original SEC filing.

Document Information

Analysis Processed

March 24, 2026 at 02:43 PM

Important Disclaimer

This AI-generated analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always consult with qualified professionals and conduct your own research before making investment decisions.