Yellowstone Midco Holdings II, LLC

CIK: 2086587 Filed: November 17, 2025 S-1

Risk Factors

  • Relies entirely on one government customer (Pentagon’s Space Development Agency) for 100% of revenue
  • High cash burn rate: Spending $124,387 on administrative + R&D vs. $32,421 gross profit
  • Profit margins per contract dropped from 23% to 13% in one year
  • Fixed-price contracts expose company to cost overrun risks
  • 75% hardware similarity between satellites increases systemic design flaw risks

Financial Metrics

$124,387 per $32,421
Administrative and R& D Expenses per Gross Profit
23% to 13%
Profit Margin per Contract ( Drop)
Tripled from $6,973 to $20,440
R& D Spending Increase

IPO Analysis

Yellowstone Midco Holdings II, LLC IPO - What You Need to Know

Hey there! If you’re thinking about investing in Yellowstone Midco’s IPO but aren’t sure where to start, here’s a plain-English breakdown. No jargon, just the basics.


1. What does this company actually do?

The company didn’t provide clear details about their core business in their IPO filing. This lack of transparency is something to consider.


2. How do they make money, and are they growing?

Yellowstone Midco’s filing skips specifics about their revenue streams or growth history. Without this info, it’s hard to gauge their financial health.


3. What are the main risks?

  • “All eggs in one basket”: 100% of their current money comes from one customer – the Pentagon’s Space Development Agency (SDA). If the SDA cuts spending (like during a government shutdown), Yellowstone’s revenue could vanish overnight.
  • “Birthday party budget risk”: Most contracts are fixed-price – like agreeing to cater a wedding for $10k, then realizing the cake costs double. They eat the extra costs.
  • "Copy-paste risk": 75% hardware similarity between satellites means a design flaw could break all models
  • Software glitches: Their self-flying satellite tech is cool… until it isn’t (imagine a space Uber app crashing)
  • Ground station gaps: If their 45 antennas get damaged/hacked, satellites go "off the grid"
  • Replacement cycle gamble: If satellites last longer than 6 years, repeat sales slow down
  • “Stuck in a lease”: They’ve spent big $$$ customizing leased facilities (like renovating a rental house). If leases expire (most are 5-10 years), they might have to pay double to move or rebuild elsewhere.
  • Government’s maxed credit card: U.S. budget fights could delay payments or kill new projects like the Golden Dome (their next big growth bet). If the Golden Dome gets scrapped, they’ll have to compete harder for smaller contracts.
  • Foreign investor roadblocks: New rules mean foreign investors face extra scrutiny (like a "no trespassing" sign for non-U.S. money). This could limit partnerships or funding options.
  • Space red tape: Need 5+ government licenses just to operate (radio frequencies, launch permits, etc.) – like needing a driver’s license, fishing license, and pilot’s license all at once.
  • Bribery landmines: Strict anti-bribery laws mean even a single shady deal overseas could trigger massive fines (think “getting busted for jaywalking… but with $1M penalties”).
  • Lawsuit lottery: They’re constantly at risk of lawsuits – from unhappy employees to patent fights. One big case could cost millions (like betting your life savings on a roulette wheel).
  • 🌎 Climate change costs: New rules could force them to spend more on eco-friendly tech – like if your favorite burger joint had to suddenly switch to $20/lb organic beef
  • Partner problems: If their suppliers/joint ventures mess up (like faking safety reports), Yellowstone gets blamed too – imagine your roommate’s pizza party trashing your shared apartment
  • Conflict of interest trap: A 2022 law blocks companies from both designing projects AND bidding on them. Like being banned from both refereeing and playing in the same game
  • "Public company headaches": Going public adds $2M+/year in paperwork costs (think hiring 5 full-time lawyers just to file reports). Managers will spend 20%+ time on investor calls/audits instead of fixing real problems.
  • Shareholder lawsuit magnet: More investors = higher chance of "why didn't you warn us?!" lawsuits if stock drops (even if it's not their fault)
  • Insurance nightmare: Directors' insurance costs could triple after IPO – like your car insurance jumping to $1,000/month after one fender bender
  • "Half the receipts" reporting: As an "emerging growth" company, they can skip some financial disclosures until 2029. It's like only showing 3/4 of your credit card statements to a mortgage lender.
  • Instant value drop: IPO price is WAY higher than their actual book value. Imagine buying a $50k car that's really only worth $15k – that's the dilution risk here.
  • Blank check danger: Management gets to spend IPO cash however they want. No guarantees they'll use it wisely vs. pet projects.
  • 🔥 Cash burn alert: They’re spending $124,387 on admin + R&D for every $32,421 they make in gross profit (like a lemonade stand spending $10 to make $3).
  • R&D gamble: Their research spending tripled recently (from $6,973 to $20,440). Cool for innovation, risky if it doesn’t lead to sales (like a bakery spending big on experimental recipes that flop).
  • Shrinking margins: Profit per contract dropped from 23% to 13% in a year – imagine selling cupcakes for $10 but your butter cost suddenly doubled.

4. How do they compare to competitors?

The filing doesn’t explain what makes Yellowstone unique or how they stack up against others in the space industry. This makes it hard to assess their competitive edge.


Final Takeaway
This IPO comes with extreme risks and limited transparency. Key concerns:

  • Relies entirely on one government customer
  • Burning cash much faster than they make it
  • Profit margins shrinking rapidly
  • No clear explanation of their business model or growth strategy

The company provided minimal information in critical areas like their operations and competition. For most investors, this might be a "watch from the sidelines" situation unless you’re comfortable with high-risk, speculative bets.

Not financial advice – just making sure you’ve got the full picture!

Document Information

Analysis Processed

November 18, 2025 at 09:17 AM

Important Disclaimer

This AI-generated analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always consult with qualified professionals and conduct your own research before making investment decisions.